Search for a distance-dependent Baryonic Tully-Fisher Relation at low redshifts
Aditi Krishak, Shantanu Desai

TL;DR
This study investigates whether the Baryonic Tully-Fisher relation (BTFR) varies with distance at low redshifts and finds no significant evidence for such a dependence, challenging previous claims of a transition at 9 and 17 Mpc.
Contribution
The paper introduces an analysis of the BTFR with parameters that vary with distance and finds these variations are statistically insignificant, providing a more consistent view of the relation at low redshifts.
Findings
No significant variation in BTFR parameters with distance.
BTFR remains consistent across different distance subsamples.
Previous claims of a transition at 9 and 17 Mpc are not supported.
Abstract
A recent work (arXiv:2104.14481) has found a statistically significant transition in the Baryonic Tully-Fisher relation (BTFR) using low redshift data (), with the transitions occurring at about 9 and 17 Mpc. Motivated by this finding, we carry out a variant of this analysis by fitting the data to an augmented BTFR, where both the exponent as well as normalization constant vary as a function of distance. We find that both the exponent and normalization constant show only a marginal variation with distance, and are consistent with a constant value, to within . We also checked to see if there is a statistically significant difference between the BTFR results after bifurcating the dataset at distances of 9 and 17 Mpc. We find that almost all the sets of subsamples obey the BTFR with /dof close to 1 and the best-fit parameters consistent across the subsamples. Only…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
