Convexity of Charged Operators in CFTs with Multiple Abelian Symmetries
Eran Palti, Adar Sharon

TL;DR
This paper explores convexity properties of charged operators in conformal field theories with multiple Abelian symmetries, proposing constraints on their charge spectrum related to the Weak Gravity Conjecture and analyzing dimensional differences.
Contribution
It extends the convexity constraints to multi-dimensional charge spaces and provides proofs and examples in two and higher dimensions, refining the conjecture accordingly.
Findings
In 2D CFTs, the sub-lattice index can be parametrically large, but is bounded by current levels.
In higher dimensions, the sub-lattice index generated by BPS operators can be large, but no parametric delay in convexity is observed.
The convexity conjecture requires modification in 2D to incorporate current levels, which can be proven.
Abstract
Motivated by the Weak Gravity Conjecture in the context of holography in AdS, it has been proposed that operators charged under global symmetries in CFTs, in three dimensions or higher, should satisfy certain convexity properties on their spectrum. A key element of this proposal is the charge at which convexity must appear, which was proposed to never be parametrically large. In this paper, we develop this constraint in the context of multiple Abelian global symmetries. We propose the statement that the convex directions in the multi-dimensional charge space should generate a sub-lattice of the total lattice of charged operators, such that the index of this sub-lattice cannot be made parametrically large. In the special case of two-dimensional CFTs, the index can be made parametrically large, which we prove by an explicit example. However, we also prove that in two dimensions there…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
