New Identifications and Multi-wavelength Properties of Extragalactic Fermi Gamma-Ray Sources in the SPT-SZ Survey Field
Lizhong Zhang, Joaquin D. Vieira, Marco Ajello, Matthew A. Malkan,, Melanie A. Archipley, Joseph Capota, Allen Foster, Greg Madejski

TL;DR
This study introduces a new cross-matching method using millimeter-wave data to identify and analyze extragalactic gamma-ray sources, significantly improving association rates and understanding of their multi-wavelength properties.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel cross-matching scheme leveraging mm data to identify gamma-ray sources, enhancing association accuracy and revealing the mm band as most effective for detecting gamma-ray blazars.
Findings
85% of 4FGL sources are associated with mm counterparts
MM band is most efficient for detecting gamma-ray blazars
MM band correlates better with gamma-ray emission than radio or X-ray bands
Abstract
The fourth Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT) catalog (4FGL) contains 5064 -ray sources detected at high significance, but 26% of them still lack associations at other wavelengths. The SPT-SZ survey, conducted between 2008 and 2011 with the South Pole Telescope (SPT), covers 2500 of the Southern sky in three millimeter-wavelength (mm) bands and was used to construct a catalog of nearly 5000 emissive sources. In this study, we introduce a new cross-matching scheme to search for multi-wavelength counterparts of extragalactic -ray sources using a mm catalog. We apply a Poissonian probability to evaluate the rate of spurious false associations and compare the multi-wavelength associations from the radio, mm, near-infrared, and X-ray with 4FGL -ray sources. In the SPT-SZ survey field, 85% of 4FGL sources are associated with mm counterparts. These mm…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
