Addressing the "Leaky Pipeline": A Review and Categorisation of Actions to Recruit and Retain Women in Computing Education
Alina Berry, Susan McKeever, Brenda Murphy, Sarah Jane Delany

TL;DR
This paper reviews and categorizes various initiatives aimed at increasing the recruitment and retention of women in computing education, highlighting the need for better evaluation of their effectiveness.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive categorization of actions to address the leaky pipeline in computing education, facilitating future planning and assessment.
Findings
Actions are categorized into Policy, Pedagogy, Influence and Support, Promotion and Engagement.
Many initiatives lack rigorous evaluation of their impact.
The work paves the way for developing a toolkit of effective actions.
Abstract
Gender imbalance in computing education is a well-known issue around the world. The term "leaky pipeline" is often used to describe the lack of retention of women before they progress to senior roles. Numerous initiatives have targeted the problem of the leaky pipeline in recent decades. This paper provides a comprehensive review of initiatives related to techniques used to boost recruitment and retention of women in undergraduate computing and related courses in higher education. The primary aim was to identify interventions or initiatives (which we called "actions") that have shown some effectiveness. A secondary objective was to structure our findings as a categorisation, in order to enable future action discussion, comparison and planning. A particular challenge faced in a significant portion of the work was the lack of evaluation: i.e. the assessment of the direct relationship…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
