Elasticity versus phase field driven motion in the phase field crystal model
Amit Acharya, Luiza Angheluta, and Jorge Vinals

TL;DR
This paper examines the limitations of the phase field crystal model in accurately representing elastic and diffusive behaviors, proposing two new theories to improve physical realism and dislocation dynamics simulation.
Contribution
It introduces two alternative theories that separate elastic distortion from phase field effects, enhancing the model's ability to simulate dislocation motion accurately.
Findings
New model accounts for relative dislocation motion
Classical model's non-physical relaxation identified
Preliminary implementation of explicit coupling
Abstract
The inherent inconsistency in identifying the phase field in the phase field crystal Theory with the material mass and, simultaneously, with material distortion is discussed. In its current implementation, elastic relaxation in the phase field crystal occurs on a diffusive time scale through a dissipative permeation mode. The very same phase field distortion that is included in solid elasticity drives diffusive motion, resulting in a non physical relaxation of the phase field crystal. We present two alternative theories to remedy this shortcoming. In the first case, it is assumed that the phase field only determines the incompatible part of the elastic distortion, and therefore one is free to specify an additional compatible distortion so as to satisfy mechanical equilibrium at all times (in the quasi static limit). A numerical solution of the new model for the case of a dislocation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
