A comparative study of back propagation and its alternatives on multilayer perceptrons
John Waldo

TL;DR
This paper compares backpropagation with alternative training algorithms for multilayer perceptrons, analyzing their stability, similarity of predictions, and neuron behavior, and introduces a new variation of one alternative algorithm.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of backpropagation and its alternatives, including a new variation of one of these algorithms, focusing on stability and neuron similarity in MLPs.
Findings
Backpropagation remains effective for MLP training.
Alternatives show comparable stability and prediction similarity.
A new variation of an alternative algorithm improves certain aspects.
Abstract
The de facto algorithm for training the back pass of a feedforward neural network is backpropagation (BP). The use of almost-everywhere differentiable activation functions made it efficient and effective to propagate the gradient backwards through layers of deep neural networks. However, in recent years, there has been much research in alternatives to backpropagation. This analysis has largely focused on reaching state-of-the-art accuracy in multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs). In this paper, we analyze the stability and similarity of predictions and neurons in MLPs and propose a new variation of one of the algorithms.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeural Networks and Applications · Machine Learning and ELM · Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
