A Sahlqvist-style Correspondence Theorem for Linear-time Temporal Logic
Rui Li, Francesco Belardinelli

TL;DR
This paper extends Sahlqvist's correspondence theory to Linear-time Temporal Logic (LTL), identifying a class of formulas with effective first-order frame correspondents, enhancing understanding of temporal logic's expressiveness.
Contribution
It develops a Sahlqvist-style correspondence theorem specifically for LTL, linking a class of LTL formulas to first-order frame conditions.
Findings
Identifies a class of LTL Sahlqvist formulas with first-order correspondents
Proves the correspondence between LTL Sahlqvist formulas and first-order frame conditions
Enhances the theoretical understanding of LTL's expressiveness and frame semantics
Abstract
The language of modal logic is capable of expressing first-order conditions on Kripke frames. The classic result by Henrik Sahlqvist identifies a significant class of modal formulas for which first-order conditions -- or Sahlqvist correspondents -- can be find in an effective, algorithmic way. Recent works have successfully extended this classic result to more complex modal languages. In this paper, we pursue a similar line and develop a Sahlqvist-style correspondence theorem for Linear-time Temporal Logic (LTL), which is one of the most widely used formal languages for temporal specification. LTL extends the syntax of basic modal logic with dedicated temporal operators Next X and Until U . As a result, the complexity of the class of formulas that have first-order correspondents also increases accordingly. In this paper, we identify a significant class of LTL Sahlqvist formulas built by…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFormal Methods in Verification · Logic, programming, and type systems · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
