An Industry 4.0 example: real-time quality control for steel-based mass production using Machine Learning on non-invasive sensor data

TL;DR

This paper demonstrates a non-invasive electromagnetic sensor combined with machine learning to predict steel quality properties in real-time during mass production, enabling improved quality control and fault detection.

Contribution

It introduces a novel non-invasive sensor-based approach with a predictive model for steel quality, validated on real production data, advancing Industry 4.0 quality control methods.

Findings

Sensor can distinguish altered steel properties

Linear model predicts yield and tensile strength accurately

Model predicts product faults with high F3-score of 0.95

Abstract

Insufficient steel quality in mass production can cause extremely costly damage to tooling, production downtimes and low quality products. Automatic, fast and cheap strategies to estimate essential material properties for quality control, risk mitigation and the prediction of faults are highly desirable. In this work we analyse a high throughput production line of steel-based products. Currently, the material quality is checked using manual destructive testing, which is slow, wasteful and covers only a tiny fraction of the material. To achieve complete testing coverage our industrial collaborator developed a contactless, non-invasive, electromagnetic sensor to measure all material during production in real-time. Our contribution is three-fold: 1) We show in a controlled experiment that the sensor can distinguish steel with deliberately altered properties. 2) 48 steel coils were fully measured non-invasively and additional destructive tests were conducted on samples to serve as ground truth. A linear model is fitted to predict from the non-invasive measurements two key material properties (yield strength and tensile strength) that normally are obtained by destructive tests. The performance is evaluated in leave-one-coil-out cross-validation. 3) The resulting model is used to analyse the material properties and the relationship with logged product faults on real production data of ~108 km of processed material measured with the non-invasive sensor. The model achieves an excellent performance (F3-score of 0.95) predicting material running out of specifications for the tensile strength. The combination of model predictions and logged product faults shows that if a significant percentage of estimated yield stress values is out of specification, the risk of product faults is high. Our analysis demonstrates promising directions for real-time quality control, risk monitoring and fault detection.