Finding Quasars behind the Galactic Plane. II. Spectroscopic Identifications of 204 Quasars at $|b|< 20\deg$
Yuming Fu, Xue-Bing Wu, Linhua Jiang, Yanxia Zhang, Zhi-Ying Huo, Y., L. Ai, Qian Yang, Qinchun Ma, Xiaotong Feng, Ravi Joshi, Wei Jeat Hon,, Christian Wolf, Jiang-Tao Li, Junjie Jin, Su Yao, Yuxuan Pang, Jian-Guo Wang,, Kai-Xing Lu, Chuan-Jun Wang, Jie Zheng, Liang Xu

TL;DR
This study reports the discovery and spectroscopic confirmation of 204 quasars behind the Galactic plane, expanding the known sample and providing valuable data for astrometric and astrophysical research despite observational challenges.
Contribution
The paper presents a large, new sample of 204 spectroscopically confirmed GPQs, including 191 new discoveries, with detailed spectral analysis and black hole mass estimates, demonstrating effective selection methods.
Findings
204 GPQs confirmed spectroscopically, 191 are new discoveries.
GPQs have higher black hole masses and luminosities than SDSS DR7 quasars.
The selection method achieves at least 85.2% purity in quasar identification.
Abstract
Quasars behind the Galactic plane (GPQs) are important astrometric references and valuable probes of Galactic gas, yet the search for GPQs is difficult due to severe extinction and source crowding in the Galactic plane. In this paper, we present a sample of 204 spectroscopically confirmed GPQs at |b|<20{\deg}, 191 of which are new discoveries. This GPQ sample covers a wide redshift range from 0.069 to 4.487. For the subset of 230 observed GPQ candidates, the lower limit of the purity of quasars is 85.2%, and the lower limit of the fraction of stellar contaminants is 6.1%. Using a multicomponent spectral fitting, we measure the emission line and continuum flux of the GPQs, and estimate their single-epoch virial black hole masses. Due to selection effects raised from Galactic extinction and target magnitude, these GPQs have higher black hole masses and continuum luminosities in comparison…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
