TL;DR
This paper introduces two physically interpretable and determinable node representation methods for complex networks, and demonstrates their effectiveness in link prediction with state-of-the-art results, emphasizing the value of physical insights over black-box machine learning.
Contribution
The paper proposes novel physically interpretable node representation methods and a network model, AIProbS, for link prediction, addressing the indeterminacy and interpretability issues of existing machine learning approaches.
Findings
AIProbS achieves state-of-the-art precision.
The methods balance interpretability and accuracy.
Physical approaches can rival machine learning models.
Abstract
As an intuitive description of complex physical, social, or brain systems, complex networks have fascinated scientists for decades. Recently, to abstract a network's structural and dynamical attributes for utilization, network representation has been one focus, mapping a network or its substructures (like nodes) into a low-dimensional vector space. Since the current methods are mostly based on machine learning, a black box of an input-output data fitting mechanism, generally the space's dimension is indeterminable and its elements are not interpreted. Although massive efforts to cope with this issue have included, for example, automated machine learning by computer scientists and computational theory by mathematics, the root causes still remain unresolved. Given that, from a physical perspective, this article proposes two determinable and interpretable node representation methods. To…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
