Optimal Solutions for Joint Beamforming and Antenna Selection: From Branch and Bound to Graph Neural Imitation Learning

TL;DR

This paper develops a branch and bound framework for globally optimal joint beamforming and antenna selection, and introduces a graph neural network-based machine learning scheme to accelerate the process while maintaining optimality.

Contribution

It presents a novel B extbar B framework for optimal solutions and a GNN-based ML scheme to speed up the search without losing optimality.

Findings

GNN-based method retains global optimality of B extbar B

ML acceleration achieves up to tenfold speedup

Framework applicable to robust beamforming with imperfect CSI

Abstract

This work revisits the joint beamforming (BF) and antenna selection (AS) problem, as well as its robust beamforming (RBF) version under imperfect channel state information (CSI). Such problems arise due to various reasons, e.g., the costly nature of the radio frequency (RF) chains and energy/resource-saving considerations. The joint (R)BF\&AS problem is a mixed integer and nonlinear program, and thus finding {\it optimal solutions} is often costly, if not outright impossible. The vast majority of the prior works tackled these problems using techniques such as continuous approximations, greedy methods, and supervised machine learning -- yet these approaches do not ensure optimality or even feasibility of the solutions. The main contribution of this work is threefold. First, an effective {\it branch and bound} (B\&B) framework for solving the problems of interest is proposed. Leveraging existing BF and RBF solvers, it is shown that the B\&B framework guarantees global optimality of the considered problems. Second, to expedite the potentially costly B\&B algorithm, a machine learning (ML)-based scheme is proposed to help skip intermediate states of the B\&B search tree. The learning model features a {\it graph neural network} (GNN)-based design that is resilient to a commonly encountered challenge in wireless communications, namely, the change of problem size (e.g., the number of users) across the training and test stages. Third, comprehensive performance characterizations are presented, showing that the GNN-based method retains the global optimality of B\&B with provably reduced complexity, under reasonable conditions. Numerical simulations also show that the ML-based acceleration can often achieve an order-of-magnitude speedup relative to B\&B.