TL;DR
This paper introduces a bilateral dependency optimization strategy to defend against model-inversion attacks by balancing dependencies between inputs, outputs, and latent representations, achieving state-of-the-art privacy protection with minimal utility loss.
Contribution
It proposes a novel bilateral dependency optimization (BiDO) approach that enhances privacy defense against MI attacks while maintaining classification performance.
Findings
BiDO outperforms existing defenses across various datasets and attacks.
BiDO achieves state-of-the-art privacy protection with minor accuracy loss.
Two implementations, BiDO-COCO and BiDO-HSIC, demonstrate effectiveness.
Abstract
Through using only a well-trained classifier, model-inversion (MI) attacks can recover the data used for training the classifier, leading to the privacy leakage of the training data. To defend against MI attacks, previous work utilizes a unilateral dependency optimization strategy, i.e., minimizing the dependency between inputs (i.e., features) and outputs (i.e., labels) during training the classifier. However, such a minimization process conflicts with minimizing the supervised loss that aims to maximize the dependency between inputs and outputs, causing an explicit trade-off between model robustness against MI attacks and model utility on classification tasks. In this paper, we aim to minimize the dependency between the latent representations and the inputs while maximizing the dependency between latent representations and the outputs, named a bilateral dependency optimization (BiDO)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
