Defending Compositionality in Emergent Languages
Michal Auersperger, Pavel Pecina

TL;DR
This paper investigates the role of compositionality in emergent languages, demonstrating its importance for generalization in neural communication systems through a two-agent game analysis.
Contribution
It clarifies the significance of compositionality for generalization, countering recent claims that neural networks can generalize without it.
Findings
Compositionality is crucial for successful generalization.
Neural networks benefit from compositional structures in language.
Proper dataset evaluation reveals the importance of compositionality.
Abstract
Compositionality has traditionally been understood as a major factor in productivity of language and, more broadly, human cognition. Yet, recently, some research started to question its status, showing that artificial neural networks are good at generalization even without noticeable compositional behavior. We argue that some of these conclusions are too strong and/or incomplete. In the context of a two-agent communication game, we show that compositionality indeed seems essential for successful generalization when the evaluation is done on a proper dataset.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLanguage and cultural evolution · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Linguistics and Cultural Studies
