Lessons from the Magellanic System and its modeling
Jianling Wang (1), Francois Hammer (2), and Yanbin Yang (2) ((1) CAS, Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories,, Beijing 100101, China (2) GEPI, Observatoire de Paris, PSL, CNRS, Place Jules, Janssen 92195, Meudon, France)

TL;DR
This paper evaluates models explaining the Magellanic Stream, finding that a 'ram-pressure plus collision' model better reproduces observed properties and predicts recent features, suggesting a low mass for the Magellanic Clouds.
Contribution
The study demonstrates that the 'ram-pressure plus collision' model effectively explains the Magellanic Stream's properties and recent observations, outperforming tidal models.
Findings
The 'ram-pressure plus collision' model reproduces the Stream's complex features.
Tidal models cannot account for the observed filaments and gas mass.
A low mass for the Magellanic Clouds is favored for Stream formation.
Abstract
The prominent Magellanic Stream that dominates the HI sky provides a tantalizing number of observations that potentially constrains the Magellanic Clouds and the Milky Way outskirts. Here we show that the 'ram-pressure plus collision' model naturally explain these properties, and is able to predict some of the most recent observations made after the model was made. These include the complexity of the stellar populations in the Magellanic Bridge, for which kinematics, ages, and distances are well measured, and the North Tidal Arm, for which the model predicts its formation from the Milky Way tidal forces. It appears that this over-constrained model provides a good path to investigate the Stream properties. This contrasts with tidal models that reproduce only half of the Stream's main properties, in particular a tidal tail cannot reproduce the observed inter-twisted filaments, and its gas…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
