Equivalence of field theories: Crane-Yetter and the shadow
Jin-Cheng Guu

TL;DR
This paper proves the long-standing conjecture that the shadow model and the Crane-Yetter invariant, two major invariants of smooth 4-manifolds, are in fact equivalent, unifying different approaches in topological quantum field theory.
Contribution
It establishes the equivalence of the shadow and Crane-Yetter invariants, clarifying their relationship and providing a dictionary between the models.
Findings
Proved the equivalence of the shadow and Crane-Yetter invariants.
Provided a survey of the shadow construction and a dictionary between models.
Highlighted the limitations of semisimple models in topological quantum field theory.
Abstract
This work solves a 28-year conjecture by showing that two major invariants of smooth 4-manifolds, the shadow model (motivated by statistical mechanics [Tur91]) and the simplicial Crane-Yetter model (motivated by topological quantum field theory [CY93]), are in fact equal. These invariants, both of which degenerate to the 3D Witten-Reshetikhin-Turaev model in a special case, had been open for years to clarify their relationship. Despite the seeming difference in their origins and formal constructions, we prove their equivalence. Along the way, we sketch a dictionary between the two models, provide a brief survey of the shadow construction \`a la Turaev, and suggest once again that the semisimple models have reached their limits.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopological and Geometric Data Analysis · Geometric and Algebraic Topology · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
