Uncovering bias in the PlantVillage dataset
Mehmet Alican Noyan

TL;DR
This paper reveals that the PlantVillage dataset contains biases that models can exploit, leading to misleadingly high accuracy, and discusses potential methods to address this issue.
Contribution
The study uncovers bias in the PlantVillage dataset and demonstrates how models can achieve high accuracy using minimal background information, highlighting the need for dataset quality assessment.
Findings
Model trained on 8 pixels achieved 49% accuracy
Bias in dataset allows models to predict labels with minimal information
Discussion of approaches to mitigate dataset bias
Abstract
We report our investigation on the use of the popular PlantVillage dataset for training deep learning based plant disease detection models. We trained a machine learning model using only 8 pixels from the PlantVillage image backgrounds. The model achieved 49.0% accuracy on the held-out test set, well above the random guessing accuracy of 2.6%. This result indicates that the PlantVillage dataset contains noise correlated with the labels and deep learning models can easily exploit this bias to make predictions. Possible approaches to alleviate this problem are discussed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSmart Agriculture and AI
MethodsTest
