Texture Extraction Methods Based Ensembling Framework for Improved Classification

TL;DR

This paper introduces a novel ensembling framework that combines multiple texture extraction techniques with a CNN backbone, achieving improved classification accuracy across various texture datasets while maintaining model efficiency.

Contribution

The paper proposes a self-selective ensembling framework that integrates multiple texture extraction methods with CNNs, enhancing texture classification performance and flexibility.

Findings

Achieved state-of-the-art results on benchmark datasets.

Global Average Pooling is less significant than texture extraction methods.

Framework accommodates additional texture-based techniques for better results.

Abstract

Texture-based classification solutions have proven their significance in many domains, from industrial inspections to health-related applications. New methods have been developed based on texture feature learning and CNN-based architectures to address computer vision use cases for images with rich texture-based features. In recent years, architectures solving texture-based classification problems and demonstrating state-of-the-art results have emerged. Yet, one limitation of these approaches is that they cannot claim to be suitable for all types of image texture patterns. Each technique has an advantage for a specific texture type only. To address this shortcoming, we propose a framework that combines more than one texture-based techniques together, uniquely, with a CNN backbone to extract the most relevant texture features. This enables the model to be trained in a self-selective manner and produce improved results over current published benchmarks -- with almost same number of model parameters. Our proposed framework works well on most texture types simultaneously and allows flexibility for additional texture-based methods to be accommodated to achieve better results than existing architectures. In this work, firstly, we present an analysis on the relative importance of existing techniques when used alone and in combination with other TE methods on benchmark datasets. Secondly, we show that Global Average Pooling which represents the spatial information -- is of less significance in comparison to the TE method(s) applied in the network while training for texture-based classification tasks. Finally, we present state-of-the-art results for several texture-based benchmark datasets by combining three existing texture-based techniques using our proposed framework.