On the zero forcing number of the complement of graphs with forbidden subgraphs
Emelie Curl, Shaun Fallat, Ryan Moruzzi Jr, Carolyn Reinhart, Derek, Young

TL;DR
This paper investigates the zero forcing number of the complement of various graph classes, extending previous results from trees to unicyclic and cactus graphs, especially those avoiding complete bipartite subgraphs.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of the zero forcing number for complements of unicyclic and cactus graphs, broadening understanding beyond trees.
Findings
Zero forcing number for complements of unicyclic graphs characterized.
Zero forcing number for complements of cactus graphs determined.
Identified conditions under which the zero forcing number takes specific values.
Abstract
Motivated in part by an observation that the zero forcing number for the complement of a tree on vertices is either or in one exceptional case, we consider the zero forcing number for the complement of more general graphs under some conditions, particularly those that do not contain complete bipartite subgraphs. We also move well beyond trees and completely study all of the possible zero forcing numbers for the complements of unicyclic graphs and cactus graphs.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGraph theory and applications · Advanced Graph Theory Research · Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics
