Consistency of the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array Signal with a Nanohertz Gravitational-wave Background
Boris Goncharov, Eric Thrane, Ryan M. Shannon, Jan Harms, N. D. Ramesh, Bhat, George Hobbs, Matthew Kerr, Richard N. Manchester, Daniel J. Reardon,, Christopher J. Russell, Xing-Jiang Zhu, Andrew Zic

TL;DR
This paper develops a new method to differentiate between gravitational-wave background signals and pulsar noise in pulsar timing data, confirming that observed signals are consistent with a pulsar term rather than a true background.
Contribution
It introduces a novel methodology to distinguish pulsar power spectra from noise, aiding in validating gravitational-wave background detections.
Findings
The observed common-spectrum process aligns with a pulsar term signature.
The methodology effectively differentiates between background signals and noise.
Results support the pulsar term as the source of the detected spectral feature.
Abstract
Pulsar timing array experiments have recently reported strong evidence for a common-spectrum stochastic process with a strain spectral index consistent with that expected of a nanohertz-frequency gravitational-wave background, but with negligible yet non-zero evidence for spatial correlations required for a definitive detection. However, it was pointed out by the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array (PPTA) collaboration that the same models used in recent analyses resulted in strong evidence for a common-spectrum process in simulations where none is present. In this work, we introduce a methodology to distinguish pulsar power spectra with the same amplitude from noise power spectra of similar but distinct amplitudes. The former is the signature of a spatially uncorrelated pulsar term of a nanohertz gravitational-wave background, whereas the latter could represent ensemble pulsar noise properties.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
