Risk Measures and Upper Probabilities: Coherence and Stratification
Christian Fr\"ohlich, Robert C. Williamson

TL;DR
This paper explores alternative probability frameworks for machine learning, focusing on spectral risk measures and upper probabilities, providing theoretical characterizations and demonstrating practical benefits in uncertainty quantification.
Contribution
It introduces a stratification of coherent risk measures via upper probabilities and empirically shows their advantages in machine learning applications.
Findings
Spectral risk measures can be characterized and stratified using upper probabilities.
The new framework improves uncertainty handling in machine learning tasks.
Empirical results demonstrate practical benefits of the approach.
Abstract
Machine learning typically presupposes classical probability theory which implies that aggregation is built upon expectation. There are now multiple reasons to motivate looking at richer alternatives to classical probability theory as a mathematical foundation for machine learning. We systematically examine a powerful and rich class of alternative aggregation functionals, known variously as spectral risk measures, Choquet integrals or Lorentz norms. We present a range of characterization results, and demonstrate what makes this spectral family so special. In doing so we arrive at a natural stratification of all coherent risk measures in terms of the upper probabilities that they induce by exploiting results from the theory of rearrangement invariant Banach spaces. We empirically demonstrate how this new approach to uncertainty helps tackling practical machine learning problems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
