The Gaia-ESO Public Spectroscopic Survey: Implementation, data products, open cluster survey, science, and legacy
S. Randich, G. Gilmore, L. Magrini, G. G. Sacco, R. J. Jackson, R. D., Jeffries, C. C. Worley, A. Hourihane, A. Gonneau, C. Viscasillas V\`azquez,, E. Franciosini, J. R. Lewis, E. J. Alfaro, C. Allende Prieto, T. Bensby R., Blomme, A. Bragaglia, E. Flaccomio, P. Fran\c{c}ois

TL;DR
The Gaia-ESO Survey is a comprehensive spectroscopic project targeting 100,000 stars to provide high-quality stellar parameters, elemental abundances, and open cluster data, significantly advancing Galactic astronomy and leaving a lasting legacy.
Contribution
This paper details the implementation, data products, and scientific achievements of the Gaia-ESO Survey, highlighting its unique scope and data quality on an 8m class telescope.
Findings
Homogeneous radial velocities and stellar parameters for over 110,000 stars.
Elemental abundances for up to 31 elements in UVES targets.
A complete data release with high-quality spectra and derived parameters.
Abstract
In the last 15 years different ground-based spectroscopic surveys have been started (and completed) with the general aim of delivering stellar parameters and elemental abundances for large samples of Galactic stars, complementing Gaia astrometry. Among those surveys, the Gaia-ESO Public Spectroscopic Survey (GES), the only one performed on a 8m class telescope, was designed to target 100,000 stars using FLAMES on the ESO VLT (both Giraffe and UVES spectrographs), covering all the Milky Way populations, with a special focus on open star clusters. This article provides an overview of the survey implementation (observations, data quality, analysis and its success, data products, and releases), of the open cluster survey, of the science results and potential, and of the survey legacy. A companion article (Gilmore et al.) reviews the overall survey motivation, strategy, Giraffe pipeline data…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
