Constraining Gaussian processes for physics-informed acoustic emission mapping

TL;DR

This paper introduces a physics-informed Gaussian process model for acoustic emission mapping that reduces data collection needs and ensures physically consistent predictions, especially in sparse measurement scenarios.

Contribution

The paper develops a constrained Gaussian process approach that embeds structural boundary conditions, improving acoustic emission localization with limited data.

Findings

Significantly reduces data collection requirements.

Incorporating boundary conditions improves prediction accuracy.

Effective in scenarios with sparse and limited coverage data.

Abstract

The automated localisation of damage in structures is a challenging but critical ingredient in the path towards predictive or condition-based maintenance of high value structures. The use of acoustic emission time of arrival mapping is a promising approach to this challenge, but is severely hindered by the need to collect a dense set of artificial acoustic emission measurements across the structure, resulting in a lengthy and often impractical data acquisition process. In this paper, we consider the use of physics-informed Gaussian processes for learning these maps to alleviate this problem. In the approach, the Gaussian process is constrained to the physical domain such that information relating to the geometry and boundary conditions of the structure are embedded directly into the learning process, returning a model that guarantees that any predictions made satisfy physically-consistent behaviour at the boundary. A number of scenarios that arise when training measurement acquisition is limited, including where training data are sparse, and also of limited coverage over the structure of interest. Using a complex plate-like structure as an experimental case study, we show that our approach significantly reduces the burden of data collection, where it is seen that incorporation of boundary condition knowledge significantly improves predictive accuracy as training observations are reduced, particularly when training measurements are not available across all parts of the structure.