An Algebraic Approach to the Goldbach and Polignac Conjectures Using Mihailescu's Theorem and $p$-adic Analysis
Jason R. South

TL;DR
The paper proves the Goldbach and Polignac conjectures by employing p-adic analysis, algebraic methods, and Mihăilescu's theorem, establishing that counterexamples cannot exist for sufficiently large numbers.
Contribution
It introduces an algebraic framework combined with Mihăilescu's theorem to prove longstanding conjectures in number theory without relying on prime distribution.
Findings
Goldbach Conjecture is proven for all even integers greater than 3.
Polignac Conjecture is derived from the Goldbach Difference Conjecture.
Counterexamples to the conjectures do not exist beyond small cases.
Abstract
We prove the Goldbach Conjecture using p-adic analysis and algebraic methods, requiring no knowledge of prime gaps or distribution by showing counterexamples exist if and only if certain polynomials have integer solutions. Assuming, for the sake of contradiction, a counter-example exists, and labeling the set of primes up to as , we construct the Goldbach Polynomial \[ \mathcal{G}_-(z) := \prod_{p_k \in \mathcal{P}} (z - p_k) - \prod_{p_k \in \mathcal{P}}p_k^{\alpha_k} \] with conditions and all are unique natural numbers. Using Hensel's Lemma, we prove each must be a perfect prime power of only a prime in , giving solutions of the form . Applying Mih\u{a}ilescu's Theorem (Catalan's Conjecture) shows the largest such polynomial is \[ \mathcal{G}_-(z) = (z - 2)(z - 3) - 2^2…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAnalytic Number Theory Research · Finite Group Theory Research · Mathematics and Applications
