Comparing Conventional and Deep Feature Models for Classifying Fundus Photography of Hemorrhages
Tamoor Aziz, Chalie Charoenlarpnopparut, Srijidtra Mahapakulchai

TL;DR
This study compares conventional and deep feature extraction methods for classifying hemorrhages in fundus photographs, finding deep models generally outperform traditional features in accuracy.
Contribution
It introduces a novel hemorrhage segmentation technique and evaluates the effectiveness of deep versus conventional features for classification.
Findings
Deep models outperform conventional features in classification accuracy.
Image preprocessing improves hemorrhage detection.
Deep features show higher robustness in challenging cases.
Abstract
Diabetic retinopathy is an eye-related pathology creating abnormalities and causing visual impairment, proper treatment of which requires identifying irregularities. This research uses a hemorrhage detection method and compares classification of conventional and deep features. Especially, method identifies hemorrhage connected with blood vessels or reside at retinal border and reported challenging. Initially, adaptive brightness adjustment and contrast enhancement rectify degraded images. Prospective locations of hemorrhages are estimated by a Gaussian matched filter, entropy thresholding, and morphological operation. Hemorrhages are segmented by a novel technique based on regional variance of intensities. Features are then extracted by conventional methods and deep models for training support vector machines, and results evaluated. Evaluation metrics for each model are promising, but…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
