Structured Two-stream Attention Network for Video Question Answering

TL;DR

This paper introduces a Structured Two-stream Attention network (STA) for video question answering, effectively capturing long-range temporal and spatial structures to improve answer accuracy on large-scale datasets.

Contribution

The paper proposes a novel STA model that jointly reasons across spatial and temporal video structures with structured attention, advancing video QA capabilities.

Findings

Significantly outperforms existing methods on TGIF-QA dataset.

Achieves 13-14% improvement on key video QA tasks.

Effectively localizes relevant visual instances and reduces background influence.

Abstract

To date, visual question answering (VQA) (i.e., image QA and video QA) is still a holy grail in vision and language understanding, especially for video QA. Compared with image QA that focuses primarily on understanding the associations between image region-level details and corresponding questions, video QA requires a model to jointly reason across both spatial and long-range temporal structures of a video as well as text to provide an accurate answer. In this paper, we specifically tackle the problem of video QA by proposing a Structured Two-stream Attention network, namely STA, to answer a free-form or open-ended natural language question about the content of a given video. First, we infer rich long-range temporal structures in videos using our structured segment component and encode text features. Then, our structured two-stream attention component simultaneously localizes important visual instance, reduces the influence of background video and focuses on the relevant text. Finally, the structured two-stream fusion component incorporates different segments of query and video aware context representation and infers the answers. Experiments on the large-scale video QA dataset \textit{TGIF-QA} show that our proposed method significantly surpasses the best counterpart (i.e., with one representation for the video input) by 13.0%, 13.5%, 11.0% and 0.3 for Action, Trans., TrameQA and Count tasks. It also outperforms the best competitor (i.e., with two representations) on the Action, Trans., TrameQA tasks by 4.1%, 4.7%, and 5.1%.