Tale of GRB 171010A/SN 2017htp and GRB 171205A/SN 2017iuk: Magnetar origin?
Amit Kumar, Shashi B. Pandey, Rahul Gupta, Amar Aryan, Amit K. Ror,, Saurabh Sharma, and Nameeta Brahme

TL;DR
This study investigates the origins of two gamma-ray bursts and their associated supernovae, supporting the magnetar model through optical observations and light-curve modeling, revealing insights into their central engines and luminosity characteristics.
Contribution
The paper provides late-time optical follow-up data and semi-analytical modeling that supports magnetar central engines for these GRB-SNe, expanding understanding of their energy sources and properties.
Findings
Magnetar energy budget supports magnetar as central engine.
SN 2017htp is among the brightest GRB-associated SNe.
SN 2017iuk is among the faintest GRB-associated SNe.
Abstract
We present late-time optical follow-up observations of GRB 171010A/SN 2017htp ( = 0.33) and low-luminosity GRB 171205A/SN 2017iuk ( = 0.037) acquired using the 4K4K CCD Imager mounted at the 3.6m Devasthal Optical Telescope (3.6m DOT) along with the prompt emission data analysis of these two interesting bursts. The prompt characteristics (other than brightness) such as spectral hardness, T, and minimum variability time-scale are comparable for both the bursts. The isotropic -ray and kinetic energies of the plateau phase of GRB 171205A are found to be less than the maximum energy budget of magnetars, supporting magnetar as a central engine powering source. The new optical data of SN 2017htp and SN 2017iuk presented here, along with published ones, indicate that SN 2017htp is one of the brightest and SN 21017iuk is among the faintest GRB associated SNe (GRB-SNe).…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
