A Chandra Survey of Milky Way Globular Clusters. III. Searching for X-ray Signature of Intermediate-mass Black Holes

TL;DR

This study systematically searches for intermediate-mass black holes in Milky Way globular clusters using archival X-ray data, finding limited evidence and highlighting the difficulty of detecting such black holes through X-ray signatures.

Contribution

It combines observational analysis with hydrodynamic simulations to assess the X-ray signatures of IMBHs, providing new insights into their elusive nature in globular clusters.

Findings

Only six clusters have X-ray sources coincident with centers, but likely due to binary stars.

Most clusters show no detectable central X-ray source, with upper limits below theoretical predictions.

Simulations indicate that accretion from stellar winds onto IMBHs produces X-ray luminosities below current detection thresholds.

Abstract

Globular clusters (GCs) are thought to harbor the long-sought population of intermediate-mass black holes (IMBHs). We present a systematic search for a putative IMBH in 81 Milky Way GCs, based on archival Chandra X-ray observations. We find in only six GCs a significant X-ray source positionally coincident with the cluster center, which have 0.5-8 keV luminosities between $\sim1\times 10^{30}~{\rm erg~s^{-1}}$ to $\sim 4\times10^{33}~{\rm erg~s^{-1}}$. However, the spectral and temporal properties of these six sources can also be explained in terms of binary stars. The remaining 75 GCs do not have a detectable central source, most with $3\sigma$ upper limits ranging between $10^{29-32}~{\rm erg~s^{-1}}$ over 0.5-8 keV, which are significantly lower than predicted for canonical Bondi accretion. To help understand the feeble X-ray signature, we perform hydrodynamic simulations of stellar wind accretion onto a $1000~{\rm M_\odot}$ IMBH from the most-bound orbiting star, for stellar wind properties consistent with either a main-sequence (MS) star or an asymptotic giant branch (AGB) star. We find that the synthetic X-ray luminosity for the MS case ($\sim 10^{19}\rm~erg~s^{-1}$) is far below the current X-ray limits. The predicted X-ray luminosity for the AGB case ($\sim 10^{34}\rm~erg~s^{-1}$), on the other hand, is compatible with the detected central X-ray sources, in particular the ones in Terzan 5 and NGC 6652. However, the probability of having an AGB star as the most-bound star around the putative IMBH is very low. Our study strongly suggests that it is very challenging to detect the accretion-induced X-ray emission from IMBHs, even if they were prevalent in present-day GCs.