Confidence Intervals for Recursive Journal Impact Factors
Johannes Konig, David I. Stern, Richard S.J. Tol

TL;DR
This paper develops confidence intervals for recursive impact factors and journal ranks, accounting for citation prestige, and applies these methods to economics journals, revealing most differences in journal quality are statistically insignificant.
Contribution
It introduces methods to compute confidence intervals for impact factors and journal ranks that incorporate citation prestige, with application to economics journals.
Findings
The Quarterly Journal of Economics has the highest impact and rank.
Most differences in journal quality are statistically insignificant.
Bootstrap methods broaden confidence intervals for mid-ranking journals.
Abstract
We compute confidence intervals for recursive impact factors, that take into account that some citations are more prestigious than others, as well as for the associated ranks of journals, applying the methods to the population of economics journals. The Quarterly Journal of Economics is clearly the journal with greatest impact, the confidence interval for its rank only includes one. Based on the simple bootstrap, the remainder of the Top5 journals are in the top 6 together with the Journal of Finance, while the Xie et al. (2009), and Mogstad et al. (2022) methods generally broaden estimated confidence intervals, particularly for mid-ranking journals. All methods agree that most apparent differences in journal quality are, in fact, mostly insignificant.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsForecasting Techniques and Applications · scientometrics and bibliometrics research · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
