Conspiracy Brokers: Understanding the Monetization of YouTube Conspiracy Theories
Cameron Ballard, Ian Goldstein, Pulak Mehta, Genesis Smothers, Kejsi, Take, Victoria Zhong, Rachel Greenstadt, Tobias Lauinger, Damon McCoy

TL;DR
This study analyzes how conspiracy theory YouTube channels monetize their content, revealing higher prevalence of predatory ads and offsite monetization methods compared to mainstream channels, highlighting potential revenue streams and risks.
Contribution
It provides the first large-scale analysis of monetization strategies and ad types on conspiracy YouTube channels, comparing them with mainstream content.
Findings
Conspiracy videos have similar well-known brand ads as mainstream videos.
Predatory or deceptive ads are nearly eleven times more common on conspiracy videos.
Over half of demonetized conspiracy channels link to third-party monetization sites.
Abstract
Conspiracy theories are increasingly a subject of research interest as society grapples with their rapid growth in areas such as politics or public health. Previous work has established YouTube as one of the most popular sites for people to host and discuss different theories. In this paper, we present an analysis of monetization methods of conspiracy theorist YouTube creators and the types of advertisers potentially targeting this content. We collect 184,218 ad impressions from 6,347 unique advertisers found on conspiracy-focused channels and mainstream YouTube content. We classify the ads into business categories and compare their prevalence between conspiracy and mainstream content. We also identify common offsite monetization methods. In comparison with mainstream content, conspiracy videos had similar levels of ads from well-known brands, but an almost eleven times higher…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
