Assessing the accuracy of the Australian Senate count: Key steps for a rigorous and transparent audit
Michelle Blom, Philip B. Stark, Peter J. Stuckey, Vanessa Teague,, Damjan Vukcevic

TL;DR
This paper discusses principles and methods for auditing the Australian Senate ballot scanning process to ensure accuracy, transparency, and rigor, including statistical approaches and recent election data analysis.
Contribution
It introduces a framework for auditing Senate ballot digitisation, combining technical details with statistical methods and recent election data analysis.
Findings
Analysis of Senate preference data from 2022 Australian election
Proposed statistical methods for audit accuracy
Guidelines for transparent and rigorous ballot auditing
Abstract
This paper explains the main principles and some of the technical details for auditing the scanning and digitisation of the Australian Senate ballot papers. We give a short summary of the motivation for auditing paper ballots, explain the necessary supporting steps for a rigorous and transparent audit, and suggest some statistical methods that would be appropriate for the Australian Senate. 22 June 2022 Update: The update includes analysis of Senate preference data from the 2022 Australian election.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting · Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
