A note on large bounding and non-bounding finite group-actions on surfaces of small genus
Bruno P. Zimmermann

TL;DR
This paper investigates which finite group-actions on small genus surfaces are bounding or geometrically bounding, focusing on large group-actions on genus 3 surfaces, and clarifies their extension properties to 3-manifolds.
Contribution
It provides a classification of bounding and geometrically bounding actions for large groups on genus 3 surfaces, extending known results to new cases.
Findings
Identifies which group-actions extend to handlebodies
Determines conditions for actions to extend to hyperbolic 3-manifolds
Focuses on large group-actions on genus 3 surfaces
Abstract
The classification of finite group-actions on closed surfaces of small genus is well-known. In the present paper we are interested in the question of which of these group-actions are bounding (extend to a compact 3-manifold with the surface as its unique boundary component, e.g. to a handlebody) or geometrically bounding (extend to a hyperbolic 3-manifold with totally geodesic boundary), concentrating, as a typical case, on large group-actions on surfaces of genus 3.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric and Algebraic Topology · Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals · Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
