A Referee Primer for Early Career Astronomers
Michelle Ntampaka, Ana Bonaca, Sownak Bose, Daniel J. Eisenstein,, Boryana Hadzhiyska, Charlotte Mason, Daisuke Nagai, Joshua S. Speagle

TL;DR
This paper provides early career astronomers with guidance on effective refereeing, emphasizing best practices and considerations to improve fairness and efficiency in the peer review process.
Contribution
It offers a structured primer for early career researchers to develop effective refereeing skills, addressing a gap in formal training.
Findings
Highlights key considerations for referees
Provides best practices for fair and efficient reviewing
Serves as a training tool for early career astronomers
Abstract
Refereeing is a crucial component of publishing astronomical research, but few professional astronomers receive formal training on how to effectively referee a manuscript. In this article, we lay out considerations and best practices for referees. This document is intended as a tool for early career researchers to develop a fair, effective, and efficient approach to refereeing.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHealth and Medical Research Impacts · Scientific Computing and Data Management · scientometrics and bibliometrics research
