Selective Inference for Sparse Multitask Regression with Applications in Neuroimaging

TL;DR

This paper introduces a selective inference framework for sparse multi-task regression in neuroimaging, enabling valid uncertainty quantification and more accurate signal recovery compared to traditional methods.

Contribution

It develops a new conditional inference procedure for multi-task sparse regression that accounts for selection, providing tighter confidence intervals and improved signal detection.

Findings

Tighter confidence intervals than data splitting methods.

More accurate recovery of true signals in simulations.

Effective application to neuroimaging data from ABCD study.

Abstract

Multi-task learning is frequently used to model a set of related response variables from the same set of features, improving predictive performance and modeling accuracy relative to methods that handle each response variable separately. Despite the potential of multi-task learning to yield more powerful inference than single-task alternatives, prior work in this area has largely omitted uncertainty quantification. Our focus in this paper is a common multi-task problem in neuroimaging, where the goal is to understand the relationship between multiple cognitive task scores (or other subject-level assessments) and brain connectome data collected from imaging. We propose a framework for selective inference to address this problem, with the flexibility to: (i) jointly identify the relevant covariates for each task through a sparsity-inducing penalty, and (ii) conduct valid inference in a model based on the estimated sparsity structure. Our framework offers a new conditional procedure for inference, based on a refinement of the selection event that yields a tractable selection-adjusted likelihood. This gives an approximate system of estimating equations for maximum likelihood inference, solvable via a single convex optimization problem, and enables us to efficiently form confidence intervals with approximately the correct coverage. Applied to both simulated data and data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, our selective inference methods yield tighter confidence intervals than commonly used alternatives, such as data splitting. We also demonstrate through simulations that multi-task learning with selective inference can more accurately recover true signals than single-task methods.