Asymmetric Equilibria in Symmetric Multiplayer Prisoners Dilemma Supergames
Davidson Cheng

TL;DR
This paper introduces a finite automaton-based solution concept for supergames, demonstrating the existence of symmetric and asymmetric equilibria in symmetric multiplayer prisoners' dilemma supergames under certain conditions.
Contribution
It proposes a novel automaton-style equilibrium concept for supergames and characterizes conditions for the existence of symmetric and asymmetric equilibria.
Findings
Supergames contain at least one symmetric equilibrium.
Asymmetric equilibria can also exist under certain conditions.
The model applies to locally non-cooperative stage games with decreasing utility functions.
Abstract
We propose a finite automaton-style solution concept for supergames. In our model, we define an equilibrium to be a cycle of state switches and a supergame to be an infinite walk on states of a finite stage game. We show that if the stage game is locally non-cooperative, and the utility function is monotonously decreasing as the number of defective agents increases, the symmetric multiagent prisoners' dilemma supergame must contain one symmetric equilibrium and can contain asymmetric equilibria.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEconomic theories and models · Game Theory and Applications · Auction Theory and Applications
