On the Effect of Triadic Closure on Network Segregation
Rediet Abebe, Nicole Immorlica, Jon Kleinberg, Brendan Lucier, and Ali, Shirali

TL;DR
This paper explores how triadic closure can counteract social segregation caused by homophily, showing through models and real-world data that fostering triadic closure can promote network integration and reduce inequalities.
Contribution
It challenges the belief that triadic closure and homophily always reinforce segregation, demonstrating that triadic closure can actually promote desegregation in social networks.
Findings
Triadic closure can reduce network segregation in theoretical models.
Empirical analysis confirms triadic closure's desegregating effect in real-world networks.
Simple interventions leveraging triadic closure can mitigate social segregation.
Abstract
The tendency for individuals to form social ties with others who are similar to themselves, known as homophily, is one of the most robust sociological principles. Since this phenomenon can lead to patterns of interactions that segregate people along different demographic dimensions, it can also lead to inequalities in access to information, resources, and opportunities. As we consider potential interventions that might alleviate the effects of segregation, we face the challenge that homophily constitutes a pervasive and organic force that is difficult to push back against. Designing effective interventions can therefore benefit from identifying counterbalancing social processes that might be harnessed to work in opposition to segregation. In this work, we show that triadic closure -- another common phenomenon that posits that individuals with a mutual connection are more likely to be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
