Ensemble simulations of the 12 July 2012 Coronal Mass Ejection with the Constant Turn Flux Rope Model

TL;DR

This study introduces a constant-turn flux rope model for simulating CMEs, accurately reproducing magnetic fields at Earth and analyzing uncertainties in predictions due to initial parameter estimations.

Contribution

The paper presents a novel constant-turn flux rope model and a comprehensive ensemble simulation approach for CME prediction, incorporating uncertainty analysis of initial parameters.

Findings

Correctly reproduced magnetic field components at Earth with ~1 hour arrival time error.

Uncertainties in GCS parameters can extend CME arrival predictions to about 12 hours.

Longitude and tilt uncertainties significantly affect magnetic field prediction accuracy.

Abstract

Flux-rope-based magnetohydrodynamic modeling of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) is a promising tool for the prediction of the CME arrival time and magnetic field at Earth. In this work, we introduce a constant-turn flux rope model and use it to simulate the 12-July-2012 16:48 CME in the inner heliosphere. We constrain the initial parameters of this CME using the graduated cylindrical shell (GCS) model and the reconnected flux in post-eruption arcades. We correctly reproduce all the magnetic field components of the CME at Earth, with an arrival time error of approximately 1 hour. We further estimate the average subjective uncertainties in the GCS fittings, by comparing the GCS parameters of 56 CMEs reported in multiple studies and catalogs. We determined that the GCS estimates of the CME latitude, longitude, tilt, and speed have average uncertainties of 5.74 degrees, 11.23 degrees, 24.71 degrees, and 11.4% respectively. Using these, we have created 77 ensemble members for the 12-July-2012 CME. We found that 55% of our ensemble members correctly reproduce the sign of the magnetic field components at Earth. We also determined that the uncertainties in GCS fitting can widen the CME arrival time prediction window to about 12 hours for the 12-July-2012 CME. On investigating the forecast accuracy introduced by the uncertainties in individual GCS parameters, we conclude that the half-angle and aspect ratio have little impact on the predicted magnetic field of the 12-July-2012 CME, whereas the uncertainties in longitude and tilt can introduce a relatively large spread in the magnetic field predicted at Earth.