Advantage of pausing: parameter setting for quantum annealers
Zoe Gonzalez Izquierdo, Shon Grabbe, Husni Idris, Zhihui Wang, Jeffrey, Marshall, Eleanor Rieffel

TL;DR
This paper investigates the benefits of pausing during quantum annealing, demonstrating improved success probabilities and solution times across various problem classes and architectures, with guidelines for optimal parameter settings.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence and qualitative guidelines for setting annealing parameters, especially pause timing and ferromagnetic coupling, on advanced quantum annealers.
Findings
Pausing improves success probability significantly.
Optimal pause parameters are robust across platforms.
Short pauses outperform longer annealing times.
Abstract
Prior work showed the efficacy of pausing midanneal: such a pause improved the probability of success by orders of magnitude in a class of native problem instances and improved the time to solution in a class of embedded problem instances. A physics-based picture provides qualitative suggestions for where pausing midanneal is effective, for the interplay between annealing schedule parameters and other annealing properties and parameters such as embedding size and strength of the ferromagnetic coupling , and for the conditions under which pausing can improve the time to solution. Here, through demonstrations on an updated annealing architecture that has higher connectivity than previous annealers, and on multiple embedded problem classes, we are able to confirm various aspects of this picture. We demonstrate the robustness of the optimal pause parameters across platforms and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
