Deep Aesthetic Assessment and Retrieval of Breast Cancer Treatment Outcomes

TL;DR

This paper introduces a deep neural network for evaluating aesthetic outcomes of breast cancer treatments, aiding in patient counseling and case comparison, with superior accuracy and case retrieval capabilities.

Contribution

It presents a novel deep learning approach for binary aesthetic assessment and case retrieval in breast cancer treatment outcomes, addressing the lack of standard evaluation methods.

Findings

Model outperforms state-of-the-art in aesthetic evaluation

Effective retrieval of similar past cases

Qualitative analysis confirms robustness and trustworthiness

Abstract

Treatments for breast cancer have continued to evolve and improve in recent years, resulting in a substantial increase in survival rates, with approximately 80\% of patients having a 10-year survival period. Given the serious impact that breast cancer treatments can have on a patient's body image, consequently affecting her self-confidence and sexual and intimate relationships, it is paramount to ensure that women receive the treatment that optimizes both survival and aesthetic outcomes. Currently, there is no gold standard for evaluating the aesthetic outcome of breast cancer treatment. In addition, there is no standard way to show patients the potential outcome of surgery. The presentation of similar cases from the past would be extremely important to manage women's expectations of the possible outcome. In this work, we propose a deep neural network to perform the aesthetic evaluation. As a proof-of-concept, we focus on a binary aesthetic evaluation. Besides its use for classification, this deep neural network can also be used to find the most similar past cases by searching for nearest neighbours in the highly semantic space before classification. We performed the experiments on a dataset consisting of 143 photos of women after conservative treatment for breast cancer. The results for accuracy and balanced accuracy showed the superior performance of our proposed model compared to the state of the art in aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer treatments. In addition, the model showed a good ability to retrieve similar previous cases, with the retrieved cases having the same or adjacent class (in the 4-class setting) and having similar types of asymmetry. Finally, a qualitative interpretability assessment was also performed to analyse the robustness and trustworthiness of the model.