Euclid: Fast two-point correlation function covariance through linear construction
E. Keihanen, V. Lindholm, P. Monaco, L. Blot, C. Carbone, K. Kiiveri,, A.G. S\'anchez, A. Viitanen, J. Valiviita, A. Amara, N. Auricchio, M. Baldi,, D. Bonino, E. Branchini, M. Brescia, J. Brinchmann, S. Camera, V. Capobianco,, J. Carretero, M. Castellano, S. Cavuoti, A. Cimatti

TL;DR
The paper introduces a fast linear construction method for estimating the covariance matrix of the two-point galaxy correlation function, significantly reducing computational costs while maintaining accuracy.
Contribution
A novel linear construction approach that estimates covariance matrices efficiently using small random catalogs, validated with simulations and applicable to large datasets.
Findings
Unbiased covariance estimates with small random catalogs.
Speed-up factor of 14 compared to standard methods.
Effective for large-scale galaxy correlation analyses.
Abstract
We present a method for fast evaluation of the covariance matrix for a two-point galaxy correlation function (2PCF) measured with the Landy-Szalay estimator. The standard way of evaluating the covariance matrix consists in running the estimator on a large number of mock catalogs, and evaluating their sample covariance. With large random catalog sizes (data-to-random objects ratio M>>1) the computational cost of the standard method is dominated by that of counting the data-random and random-random pairs, while the uncertainty of the estimate is dominated by that of data-data pairs. We present a method called Linear Construction (LC), where the covariance is estimated for small random catalogs of size M = 1 and M = 2, and the covariance for arbitrary M is constructed as a linear combination of these. We validate the method with PINOCCHIO simulations in range r = 20-200 Mpc/h, and show…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
