Category ${\mathscr{C}}_{k}$ of multi-loop algebra representations versus modular representations: Questions of G. Lusztig
Shrawan Kumar

TL;DR
This paper investigates the relationship between Lusztig's category of multi-loop algebra representations and modular representations, providing counterexamples to some of Lusztig's posed questions.
Contribution
It demonstrates that certain questions posed by Lusztig about the connection between these representation categories have negative answers.
Findings
Some of Lusztig's questions about the category ${\\mathscr{C}}_{k}$ are negatively answered.
Counterexamples show the disconnect between multi-loop algebra representations and modular representations.
The results clarify limitations in the correspondence between these two types of representations.
Abstract
Lusztig defined an abelian category of a class of representations of a multi-loop algebra and asked various questions connecting it to the modular representation theory of simple algebraic groups in char. p>0. The aim of this paper is to show that some of these questions have negative answer.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Geometry · Advanced Topics in Algebra · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
