CHEX-MATE: Morphological analysis of the sample
Maria Giulia Campitiello, Stefano Ettori, Lorenzo Lovisari, Iacopo, Bartalucci, Dominique Eckert, Elena Rasia, Mariachiara Rossetti, Fabio, Gastaldello, Gabriel W. Pratt, Ben Maughan, Etienne Pointecouteau, Mauro, Sereno, Veronica Biffi, Stefano Borgani, Federico De Luca

TL;DR
This study analyzes the X-ray morphology of 118 galaxy clusters from the CHEX-MATE project to classify their dynamical states using morphological parameters and a combined relaxation metric, comparing observations with simulations.
Contribution
It introduces a new combined morphological parameter for continuous classification of galaxy clusters' dynamical states and compares observational data with simulations.
Findings
Morphological parameters are strongly correlated and effectively distinguish relaxed and disturbed clusters.
Sunyaev-Zeldovich clusters tend to be more disturbed than X-ray selected ones.
Simulations generally agree with observations, except for concentration due to AGN feedback effects.
Abstract
In this work, we performed an analysis of the X-ray morphology of the 118 CHEX-MATE (Cluster HEritage project with XMM-Newton - Mass Assembly and Thermodynamics at the Endpoint of structure formation) galaxy clusters, with the aim to provide a classification of their dynamical state. To investigate the link between the X-ray appearance and the dynamical state, we considered four morphological parameters: the surface brightness concentration, the centroid shift, and the second- and third-order power ratios. These indicators result to be: strongly correlated with each other, powerful in identifying the disturbed and relaxed population, characterised by a unimodal distribution and not strongly influenced by systematic uncertainties. In order to obtain a continuous classification of the CHEX-MATE objects, we combined these four parameters in a single quantity, M, which represents the grade…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
