Bosonic fields in states with undefined particle numbers possess detectable non-contextuality features, plus more
Konrad Schlichtholz, Antonio Mandarino, Marek \.Zukowski

TL;DR
This paper develops a framework to demonstrate non-classicality, including contextuality and entanglement, in bosonic fields with undefined particle numbers, extending quantum nonlocality tests beyond fixed-particle scenarios.
Contribution
It introduces a novel method to extend Kochen-Specker contextuality proofs to bosonic quantum fields with undefined particle numbers, using a representation of the $rak{su}(2)$ algebra.
Findings
Violations of local realism demonstrated in bosonic fields with undefined particle numbers.
Effective entanglement indicators based on specially defined Pauli-like observables.
Nonclassicality revealed in quantum optical states like bright squeezed vacuum and bright-GHZ states.
Abstract
Most of the paradoxical, for the classical intuition, features of quantum theory were formulated for situations which involve a fixed number of particles. While one can now find a formulation of Bell's theorem for quantum fields, a Kochen-Specker-type reasoning is usually formulated for just one particle, or like in the case of Peres-Mermin square for two. A question emerges. Is it possible to formulate a contextuality proof for situation in which the numbers of particles are fundamentally undefined? We address this problem for bosonic fields. We introduce a representation of the algebra in terms of boson number states in two modes that allows us to assess nonclassicality of states of bosonic fields. As a figure of merit of a nonclassical behaviour we analyze first of all contextuality, and we show that the introduced observables are handy and efficient to reveal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
