Coend Optics for Quantum Combs
James Hefford (University of Oxford), Cole Comfort (University of, Oxford)

TL;DR
This paper compares two categorical definitions of quantum combs, showing their equivalence under certain conditions and extending the framework to n-combs, with implications for quantum theory modeling.
Contribution
It establishes a formal equivalence between intensional and extensional definitions of quantum combs using category theory and extends the framework to polycategories of n-combs.
Findings
Full and bijective functor relates the two definitions.
Conditions identified for categorical isomorphism.
Framework extended to polycategories of n-combs.
Abstract
We compare two possible ways of defining a category of 1-combs, the first intensionally as coend optics and the second extensionally as a quotient by the operational behaviour of 1-combs on lower-order maps. We show that there is a full and bijective on objects functor quotienting the intensional definition to the extensional one and give some sufficient conditions for this functor to be an isomorphism of categories. We also show how the constructions for 1-combs can be extended to produce polycategories of n-combs with similar results about when these polycategories are equivalent. The extensional definition is of particular interest in the study of quantum combs and we hope this work might produce further interest in the usage of optics for modelling these structures in quantum theory.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topics in Algebra · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
