Impartial Selection with Additive Guarantees via Iterated Deletion
Javier Cembrano, Felix Fischer, David Hannon, Max Klimm

TL;DR
This paper presents a deterministic impartial selection mechanism with additive guarantees that scale with the number of nominations, matching randomized bounds for certain cases and proving optimality in worst-case scenarios.
Contribution
It introduces a new deterministic mechanism for impartial selection with additive guarantees depending on nominations, extending prior randomized results and establishing optimality.
Findings
Deterministic mechanism achieves $O(n^{(1+ abla)/2})$ additive guarantee.
For constant nominations, guarantee is $O( oot{2}]{n})$.
The mechanism's bounds are proven to be tight and optimal.
Abstract
Impartial selection is the selection of an individual from a group based on nominations by other members of the group, in such a way that individuals cannot influence their own chance of selection. For this problem, we give a deterministic mechanism with an additive performance guarantee of in a setting with individuals where each individual casts nominations, where . For , i.e., when each individual casts at most a constant number of nominations, this bound is . This matches the best-known guarantee for randomized mechanisms and a single nomination. For the bound is . This is trivial, as even a mechanism that never selects provides an additive guarantee of . We show, however, that it is also best possible: for every deterministic impartial mechanism there exists a situation in which…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Voting Systems · Auction Theory and Applications · Game Theory and Applications
