Risks and Returns of Uniswap V3 Liquidity Providers
Lioba Heimbach, Eric Schertenleib, Roger Wattenhofer

TL;DR
Uniswap V3 introduces complex decision-making for liquidity providers, leading to highly variable risks and returns, favoring sophisticated traders over retail participants.
Contribution
This paper develops a theoretical model and empirical analysis to illustrate the complexities and risks faced by liquidity providers in Uniswap V3, highlighting its departure from previous DEX designs.
Findings
Liquidity provision in Uniswap V3 is highly complex and variable.
Simple strategies yield modest returns in low-volatility pools.
High returns require active management and acceptance of increased risks.
Abstract
Trade execution on Decentralized Exchanges (DEXes) is automatic and does not require individual buy and sell orders to be matched. Instead, liquidity aggregated in pools from individual liquidity providers enables trading between cryptocurrencies. The largest DEX measured by trading volume, Uniswap V3, promises a DEX design optimized for capital efficiency. However, Uniswap V3 requires far more decisions from liquidity providers than previous DEX designs. In this work, we develop a theoretical model to illustrate the choices faced by Uniswap V3 liquidity providers and their implications. Our model suggests that providing liquidity on Uniswap V3 is highly complex and requires many considerations from a user. Our supporting data analysis of the risks and returns of real Uniswap V3 liquidity providers underlines that liquidity providing in Uniswap V3 is incredibly complicated, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
