CLEAR: The Evolution of Spatially Resolved Star Formation in Galaxies between $0.5\lesssim z \lesssim1.7$ using H$\alpha$ Emission Line Maps
Jasleen Matharu, Casey Papovich, Raymond C. Simons, Ivelina Momcheva,, Gabriel Brammer, Zhiyuan Ji, Bren E. Backhaus, Nikko J. Cleri, Vicente, Estrada-Carpenter, Steven L. Finkelstein, Kristian Finlator, Mauro, Giavalisco, Intae Jung, Adam Muzzin, Annalisa Pillepich

TL;DR
This study uses spatially resolved H-alpha maps from HST to investigate galaxy growth and star formation gradients between redshifts 0.5 and 1.7, revealing inside-out growth and evolving central star formation activity.
Contribution
It provides new measurements of galaxy size and star formation surface density evolution over redshift, using high-resolution H-alpha maps and comparing with cosmological simulations.
Findings
Galaxy effective radius is 1.2 times larger than stellar continuum at z~0.5.
No significant evolution in galaxy size from z~1.7 to z~0.5.
Decrease in central star formation surface density with decreasing redshift.
Abstract
Using spatially resolved H-alpha emission line maps of star-forming galaxies, we study the evolution of gradients in galaxy assembly over a wide range in redshift (). Our measurements come from deep Hubble Space Telescope WFC3 G102 grism spectroscopy obtained as part of the CANDELS Lyman-alpha Emission at Reionization (CLEAR) Experiment. For star-forming galaxies with Log, the mean H-alpha effective radius is times larger than that of the stellar continuum, implying inside-out growth via star formation. This measurement agrees within with those measured at and from the 3D-HST and KMOS-3D surveys respectively, implying no redshift evolution. However, we observe redshift evolution in the stellar mass surface density within 1 kiloparsec (). Star-forming galaxies at…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
