How well do local relations predict gas-phase metallicity gradients? Results from SDSS-IV MaNGA
Nicholas F. Boardman, Gail Zasowski, Jeffrey A. Newman, Sebastian F., Sanchez, Brett Andrews, Jorge K. Barrera-Ballesteros, Jianhui Lian, Rog\'erio, Riffel, Rogemar A. Riffel, Adam Schaefer, Kevin Bundy

TL;DR
This study investigates how well local kpc-scale relations can predict gas-phase metallicity gradients in galaxies, revealing that local relations explain most trends but some extended galaxies show steeper gradients than predicted.
Contribution
It demonstrates that local stellar mass surface density and recent star formation histories can largely predict metallicity gradients, with some discrepancies in extended galaxies.
Findings
Local relations reproduce overall mass--size trend qualitatively.
Correcting for recent star formation improves predictions.
Extended galaxies have steeper gradients than models predict.
Abstract
Gas-phase metallicity gradients in galaxies provide important clues to those galaxies' formation histories. Using SDSS-IV MaNGA data, we previously demonstrated that gas metallicity gradients vary systematically and significantly across the galaxy mass--size plane: at stellar masses beyond approximately , more extended galaxies display steeper gradients (in units of ) at a given stellar mass. Here, we set out to develop a physical interpretation of these findings by examining the ability of local kpc-scale relations to predict the gradient behaviour along the mass--size plane. We find that local stellar mass surface density, when combined with total stellar mass, is sufficient to reproduce the overall mass--size trend in a qualitative sense. We further find that we can improve the predictions by correcting for residual trends relating…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
