How Not to Handle Keys: Timing Attacks on FIDO Authenticator Privacy

TL;DR

This paper uncovers a timing attack on FIDO2 authenticators that can link user accounts across services, posing a significant privacy risk, especially since the vulnerability persists despite certification and cannot be easily patched.

Contribution

The paper identifies a novel timing vulnerability in FIDO2 authenticators that enables remote linking of user accounts, highlighting a critical privacy flaw in the protocol implementation.

Findings

Two of eight tested authenticators were vulnerable despite certification.

The attack can be executed remotely due to browser implementation.

Vulnerability cannot be easily mitigated on authenticators.

Abstract

This paper presents a timing attack on the FIDO2 (Fast IDentity Online) authentication protocol that allows attackers to link user accounts stored in vulnerable authenticators, a serious privacy concern. FIDO2 is a new standard specified by the FIDO industry alliance for secure token online authentication. It complements the W3C WebAuthn specification by providing means to use a USB token or other authenticator as a second factor during the authentication process. From a cryptographic perspective, the protocol is a simple challenge-response where the elliptic curve digital signature algorithm is used to sign challenges. To protect the privacy of the user the token uses unique key pairs per service. To accommodate for small memory, tokens use various techniques that make use of a special parameter called a key handle sent by the service to the token. We identify and analyse a vulnerability in the way the processing of key handles is implemented that allows attackers to remotely link user accounts on multiple services. We show that for vulnerable authenticators there is a difference between the time it takes to process a key handle for a different service but correct authenticator, and for a different authenticator but correct service. This difference can be used to perform a timing attack allowing an adversary to link user's accounts across services. We present several real world examples of adversaries that are in a position to execute our attack and can benefit from linking accounts. We found that two of the eight hardware authenticators we tested were vulnerable despite FIDO level 1 certification. This vulnerability cannot be easily mitigated on authenticators because, for security reasons, they usually do not allow firmware updates. In addition, we show that due to the way existing browsers implement the WebAuthn standard, the attack can be executed remotely.