Neurofeminism: feminist critiques of research on sex/gender differences in the neurosciences
Kassandra Friedrichs, Philipp Kellmeyer

TL;DR
This paper reviews neurofeminist critiques of neuroscientific research on sex and gender differences, emphasizing the importance of cautious interpretation to avoid sexist biases and neurosexism.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive overview of neurofeminist literature, highlighting critical perspectives and recent developments to guide neuroscientists in evaluating gender-related research.
Findings
Identifies common levels of analysis in neurofeminist critique
Discusses recent neurofeminist scholarship and its implications
Highlights the importance of responsible interpretation of neuroscientific data
Abstract
Over the last three decades, the human brain, and its role in determining behavior have been receiving a growing amount of attention in academia as well as in society more generally. Neuroscientific explanations of human behavior or other phenomena are often especially appealing to lay people. Therefore, neuroscientific explanations that can affect individuals, groups, or social relations in general should be formulated in a careful and responsible way. One field in which especially feminist scholars request more caution is the neuroscientific examination of sex or gender differences. Feminist scholars have described various ways in which sexist bias might be present in neuroscientific research on sex or gender differences. In this context, they coined the term "neurosexism" to describe the entanglement between neuroscientific work and sexist ideology, and "neurofeminism" as a response…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
