The Splendors and Miseries of Heavisidisation
V.Dolotin, A.Morozov

TL;DR
This paper explores the potential and challenges of representing scientific problems using iterated Heaviside functions, aiming to reformulate scientific theories within a constructive mathematical framework.
Contribution
It introduces a novel perspective on reformulating scientific problems through Heavisidisation, outlining initial steps towards this ambitious goal.
Findings
Identifies obstacles in expressing scientific answers as iterated Heaviside functions
Proposes a reformulation program for scientific theories using this representation
Highlights the potential for a constructive mathematics approach in natural sciences
Abstract
Machine Learning (ML) is applicable to scientific problems, i.e. to those which have a well defined answer, only if this answer can be brought to a peculiar form with expressed as a combination of iterated Heaviside functions. At present it is far from obvious, if and when such representations exist, what are the obstacles and, if they are absent, what are the ways to convert the known formulas into this form. This gives rise to a program of reformulation of ordinary science in such terms -- which sounds like a strong enhancement of the constructive mathematics approach, only this time it concerns all natural sciences. We describe the first steps on this long way.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms
